Home >> Encyclopedia-britannica-volume-11-part-2-gunnery-hydroxylamine >> Hose to Hugh Price Hughes >> Housekeeping

Housekeeping

Loading


HOUSEKEEPING. The control or management of house hold affairs, including (I) the provision of sufficient and suitable food for all members of the household, (2) the control of house hold expenditure, (3) the engaging and supervision of servants and (4) the responsibility for the cleaning, warming and lighting of the house, and the care, laundering and renewal of the linen.

Organization and Routine.

Housekeeping is one of the most comprehensive occupations that a woman can undertake, for there are few other careers which demand a knowledge of such widely different subjects as child welfare, dietetics, marketing, cooking, elementary finance, mending, home nursing and enter taining, and many people undertake this exacting work without any previous experience. It is therefore not surprising that diffi culties frequently arise.

Just as the heads of commercial undertakings run them method ically and on strict business lines, the housekeeper must make full use of her organizing ability if she wants to make a success of her work. She should regard herself as the managing director and should aim at reaching a high standard of efficiency by care ful and methodical planning, and by keeping her ideas up to date.

Whilst it is unwise to introduce unnecessary rules into the home, the first duty of the housekeeper should be to draw up a budget for her own guidance, so that expenditure may not exceed the allowance, and a daily and weekly plan of work for herself and maids. By this means, mismanagement and confusion will be avoided.

Budgeting the Income.

The sum to be allotted for house keeping expenses should be agreed of ter due consideration, bearing in mind not only the income but all fixed expenses. For example, parents willingly forego some of the amenities of life in order that their children may have a liberal education. Therefore, dur ing the period that educational expenses are high it may be neces sary to cut down the housekeeping expenditure considerably. This can be achieved by the reduction of domestic staff, curtail ment of entertainment, and in other ways, but it is false economy to reduce either the quantity or quality of the food.

When the income is strictly limited, ill health and other con tingencies demand the practice of strict economy, and frequently the cutting down of the housekeeping allowance is the only way by which this may be achieved.

Although space will not permit a discussion of family finance at great length, sufficient has been said to show that it is difficult to make a hard and fast rule, or to state definitely with any degree of accuracy what proportion of the total income should be allocated to housekeeping in any particular ménage.

After making careful study of a number of budgets, it would ap pear that incomes above £400 may be apportioned as follows: 40% Housekeeping Expenses including wages.

15%O Rent, rates and taxes or mortgage.

1o% Education. io% Clothing. 1o% Holidays. 8% Insurance and Saving.

2% Charity. 5% Incidental.

N.B. Considerably more than 15% of incomes under £40o will be required for rent, etc.

Cost of Food.

It is possible to feed a family of three adults on Io/6d per head per week, at prices ruling in Britain in 1928. This sum provides a balanced diet and one which—at least physi ologically—is sufficient in quantity, although the fare would not be particularly interesting. If an attractive diet and good quality food are desired, at least 17/- to 20/- per head per week must be allowed when catering for as small a number as three adults. If the numbers are increased, the cost can be reduced to 15/ to 17/- per head, although it is impossible to provide luxuries for this sum.

Housekeeping Expenses.—Not only is it necessary to decide the sum to be allocated to housekeeping expenses, but it is also very important that the person responsible for spending the money should have definite knowledge as to her responsibilities.

In large establishments it is customary for a paid housekeeper to receive an allowance from which she pays all tradesmen's accounts for food, cleaning materials, laundry, renewals, servants' wages and small incidental expenses. Accounts for repairs to the fabric of the house, charges for gas, electricity and water and local rates are usually dealt with by the head of the house.

In small households the housewife of ten prefers—particularly if she has any business ability—to be responsible for every cost incurred in connection with the management of the home, includ ing rates, monthly or quarterly tradesmen's accounts, wages, etc. When this arrangement is decided upon it is advisable to open an account at a local bank, and utilise it entirely for household ex penses, the head of the house paying in the agreed sum of money either monthly, quarterly or half yearly and the housewife drawing the cheques herself.

When circumstances are such that it is not convenient or neces sary to adopt this method, or when the housekeeper does not wish to shoulder the responsibility, she should receive an allowance in cash weekly out of which tradesmen's bills, laundry, small inci dental expenses and weekly wages should be paid, the husband settling monthly and quarterly accounts, rates, taxes and rent as they become due.

The keeping of a simple system of household accounts is strongly advised, in which money expended on clothes and per sonal items should be kept entirely separate.

Housekeeping in the Servantless Home.—Owing to the scarcity and relative inefficiency of domestic help combined with the increased cost of living and wages, a very large number of housewives who previously kept one or two maids now prefer to do their own work, and provided the members of the family appreciate the changed conditions, the running of a servantless house need not deprive the housewife of her outside interests, friends and pleasures.

Labour Saving Houses and Equipment.—Having decided to dispense with paid labour, those who are living in old-fashioned houses which appear to have been designed with the object of making work, will naturally endeavour to obtain a modern dwelling better suited to the new conditions. Such houses are not difficult to find, for builders are now providing houses in which a serious attempt is made to reduce labour to a minimum. When selecting a house to be run with little or no paid labour, attention should be paid to the following points:— I . The wiring of the house for electric power as well as for lighting and, if power is not available, when it is likely to be in the near future. Only those who regularly use such efficient and tireless servants as electric cleaning and washing machines, floor polishers, toasters, kettles and irons can appreciate the labour they save.

2. The elimination of all unnecessary mouldings on windows, etc., dust collecting cornices, and tarnishable metal fittings.

3. The proximity of the kitchen to dining-room and the pro vision of a serving-hatch. The absence of steps, not only at the front entrance but between the kitchen and living room, so that full use can be made of a tray wagon, thus eliminating the carrying of trays.

4. The provision of built-in cupboards, the shelves of which can be reached without strain or inconvenience.

5. The position of the sink in relation to the cooking stove and larder, for step saving is worthy of much greater attention than it receives.

These few points are sufficient to indicate that the actual plan ning and design of a house affects very largely the possibilities of saving labour.

Planning the Work of a Servantless House.

It is pre sumed that the house consists of two living rooms, hall, kitchen and scullery, four bedrooms, bathroom and staircase.

8.3o

Clear away and wash up. Open beds.

9.0o Sweep porch, clean steps and letterbox, and shake mats.

9.15

Daily work in dining- and sitting-rooms.

9.45 Make beds. Sweep or vacuum and dust bedrooms, bathroom, landing, stairs and hall.

10.40 Prepare for lunch and evening meal. Shopping when necessary.

11.30-12.45 Weekly work.

12.45 Cooking.

1.15 Lunch.

1.5o

Washing up. Sweep and dust kitchen, etc.

3.0o– 4.3o Free time.

Tea and free tim

e.

6 . oo

Prepare evening meal.

7.00

Supper or dinner.

8.00

Clear away.

Weekly Work.—Monday, Laundrywork; Tuesday, Ironing; Wednesday, turning out dining-room and lounge alternate weeks; Thursday, turning out two bedrooms; Friday, bathroom, landing and kitchen ; Saturday, stairs and hall.

The One-Maid House.—Where one maid is kept and there are no children, the arrangement of work given above could be adhered to. The mothers of young children generally prefer to take complete charge of them, leaving the maid free to do the housework.

The mistress of a one-maid house must organise the work of the house so that the maid has at least two hours a day free, one evening or half-day a week and every Sunday afternoon and evening.

The conditions of domestic service will then more nearly re semble those of industrial work, and dissatisfaction is less likely to occur.

Homes with More Than One Servant.—A mistake com monly made by inexperienced housewives is to attempt to run their house with too small a staff, and failing to give assistance when it is required. Therefore, it is most important that a plan of work and time tables similar to that given for the servantless house, be drawn up, in which the duty of each maid is stated. If, after it has been tried, it does not prove satisfactory the matter should be discussed with the senior maid and the time table modi fied. If dealt with sympathetically few maids prove unwilling to co-operate with a mistress who is interested in their welfare.

Another duty of the housekeeper is to provide a comfortable sitting room in which maids can spend their leisure time.

Duties of Servants.— The Cook is responsible for all cooking, and sometimes for the cleaning of dining room, kitchen and larder.

The Parlourmaid waits at table, is responsible for the drawing room and lounge, answers the door and valets the master.

The Housemaid is responsible for bedrooms, bathroom and dressing rooms.

The House-Parlourmaid combines the duties of housemaid and parlourmaid. (D. D. C. T.) The general principles of household management, while the same in all countries, must be modified in the United States to meet the diversified conditions of American life.

The Household Employee.

From colonial times the prob lem of paid help in the household has been greater than in older countries, since the opportunities for work other than domestic have been more numerous. Families on the same economic level as those employing three or four servants in Europe, employ one "general housework" girl in the United States, with perhaps some part-time assistance for cleaning and laundry. The social posi tion of the household "help" was not affected in colonial times by domestic service, but with the increase of industrial and clerical work open to women the servant's status sank in the social scale. Also the hours of duty were longer and the per sonal freedom of the servant in her "time off" was often restricted by the demands of the employer. "Living in" meant no home in which to receive friends, and the bedroom of the servant was often unattractive. In consequence, the number of American girls willing to do such work steadily lessened, and even immigrant girls soon learned that they would have greater freedom and better social advantages in other employments. With the restric tion of immigration the servant supply was left far below the demand.

Of recent years there has grown steadily, especially in large cities, a movement to put the work of the household employee on an industrial basis. The aim of this movement is to arrange for the employee an eight-hour day, a six-day week, to live and eat out, and to be called "Miss" or "Mrs." as would be done in a shop or office. By this arrangement the employer receives eight hours of steady work, almost invariably more work than was done in the longer hours of the old type of servant. The day off is chosen by the employer. Where there is only one employee, this leaves the housewife responsible for one meal each day, and three on one day. If two are employed, or even one full-time and one part-time, the hours can all be covered by a proper schedule. The employer saves the cost of an extra bedroom, often high in large cities, and the cost of food, which to-day is no small matter. A higher weekly wage compensates for this. Part-time service on this basis is increasing, and bids fair to solve the household help problem for many housewives who cannot afford full-time service. The social stigma is largely removed by this plan, and it is believed that an increasing number of girls and women now employed as industrial workers or clerks will prefer this less monotonous and equally well-paid occupation.

Labour-saving Devices.

The scarcity of household em ployees, the cost of employing them and the desire of the home maker for more time for other interests, have combined to stimu late the production and general use of labour-saving devices. The rapid growth of available electric power has made possible the greater number of these, and widespread advertising has made them known to everyone. The electric iron, toaster, grill, vacuum cleaner and washing machine are widely used; the electric or gas refrigerator, the electric dishwasher, floor polisher and mangle are sold in astounding numbers. From 1924 to 1928 the sale of electric washing machines doubled, and the sale of small electric equipment (including vacuum cleaners) increased 2,000%. In a single year there were sold 790,000 washing machines and 1,028,000 vacuum cleaners. Many of these were sold on the instalment plan, showing that they went to homes of moderate or low income. The use of electric ranges increases less rapidly, since in most urban communities gas is still the cheaper fuel.

Care of the House.

In industrial centres and in many other places the use of soft coal entails more cleaning and therefore more wear and tear. Paint for walls is much more easily cleaned than wall-paper, and is more widely used. The use of the vacuum cleaner and the general substitution of rugs for carpets simplify the problem somewhat. The number of cleansing agents for household use is enormous. As yet no testing bureau supplies the housewife with adequate data regarding these, but the Ameri can Home Economics Association and the Bureau of Home Econo mics of the U.S. Department of Agriculture are stressing the necessity for this. Much attention has been given to planning and arranging the kitchen equipment to make the work as easy and efficient as possible.

Laundry.

Modern equipment simplifies the laundry work, but in cities, lack of space for the work and the cost of hiring a laundress usually make it economical to send at least the house hold linen to a commercial laundry. It may be returned as "wet wash," to be dried and ironed at home, rough dried, to be ironed at home, or finished. The prevalence of silk underwear and silk stockings or socks makes possible easy laundering of these at home. Dry cleaning of clothing, wool blankets, etc., is generally done in commercial establishments, though much of it is still done in the home.

Aids in Housekeeping.

The Bureau of Home Economics of the U.S. Department of Agriculture does much research work, publishes helpful bulletins for the homemaker and gives personal advice to enquirers. The agents of the extension service of the same department daily teach, advise and help thousands of women in the rural districts and the smaller communities. (See HOME ECONOMICS.) The U.S. Bureau of Standards does testing of value to the housekeeper, though at present this information does not of ten reach her. The women's magazines and the farm journals, which are many and whose combined circulation runs into mil lions, give their readers much valuable matter, and some of them conduct testing bureaux. They also publish pamphlets on vari ous housekeeping subjects. Some large newspapers provide daily or weekly well-ordered and authentic information for the home maker, and many other papers give more or less desultory in formation. The housewife can get information regarding any part of her task and at low cost. (See also BUDGET, FAMILY.) BIBLIOGRAPHY.-C. W. Taber, The Business of the Household Bibliography.-C. W. Taber, The Business of the Household (1918) ; L. M. Gilbreth, The Home-Maker and Her Job (1927) ; L. R. Balderston, Housewifery (1924), Laundering (19a 3) ; H. D. Robinson, The Care of the Home (1927) ; F. W. Ives, Home Conveniences (1924).

(I. E. L.)

house, home, household, electric, time, weekly and expenses