Bismuth is useless for the cure of syphilis if given by the mouth and its injection into veins is practised very little on account of its greater toxicity when administered by this route. Bismuth is gen erally considered to be an adjuvant rather than a substitute for arsenobenzol treatment. It is retained in the tissues for long after a series of injections has been given, and it thus prolongs the anti syphilitic effect after all the arsenobenzol has been excreted.
The powerful effect of the arsenobenzol and bismuth com pounds on the germ of syphilis has led to a number of experiments to determine whether or not they prevent the development of syphilis after inoculation.
There is strong evidence to the effect that a few arsenobenzol injections given after contamination with syphilitic virus does protect against the disease. Kolle has produced experimental evi dence tending to show that the injection of bismuth carbonate protects against infection resulting from inoculation with syphilitic virus so long as the compound remains in the muscles. Rabbits treated thus proved resistant to inoculation with syphilitic mate rial for as long as 109 days after injection of the bismuth.
The disadvantage of injections as a method of preventing syph ilis after venereal risk led Levaditi to try an arsenical compound called stovarsol or acetyl-oxyamino-phenyl arsenic acid, which is administered by the mouth. There is good evidence that the ingestion of stovarsol in suitable doses prevents infection, but considerably more work on the subject will be necessary before stovarsol can safely be given to the public as a prophylactic against syphilis.