§ 12. Mediation and voluntary arbitration. The labor controversies in which the public has the largest interest as a third party' are those that result or may result in strikes. The public interest becomes acute when a strike results in interference with the individual freedom of other workers and of non-participants, when it causes a blocking of the highways and disturbance of the peace, and when it prevents the regu lar production and transportation of the commodities that the public consumes. The public, therefore, has steadily be come more interested in all methods and agencies designed to conserve better relations between employers and wage workers, and to diminish or, if possible, to do away with strikes when individual and collective bargaining between the two parties fail.
Mediation, or conciliation, is the effort of a third party to get the two parties to a trade dispute to come together to agree peaceably upon a settlement. Mediation may be volun tarily undertaken in a particular case by any citizen or by a public official, usually the executive (mayor, governor, or President) ; or it may be by a regular public state or national commission charged with this duty (as in some seventeen states).
Arbitration is the decision, by a disinterested person (or commission) to whom it is submitted, of the exact terms, after a provisional settlement of a dispute. It is voluntary when the parties agree in advance to accept the verdict, and com pulsory when they are compelled by law to submit to arbitra tion and abide by the verdict.
Some provision either of voluntary private or of public agencies to mediate between the parties in labor disputes and to facilitate voluntary arbitration has been made of late in most communities of the civilized world, including thirty two of our states. No one objects to them, and they ac complish much good; but they fail oftenest in the greater emergencies because of the unwillingness of one or the other i 16.
party to submit the case, or because of lack of any power to enforce the decisions.
During the World War many plans of arbitration were devised in various countries. The most notable of these in America was the Federal War Labor Board to arbitrate in disputes between railroads and train operatives engaged in interstate commerce. Steps had earlier been taken in this direction! first by the act of 1888, then by the Erdman Act of 1898, superseded by the Newlands Act of 1913, and sup plemented by measures for mediation by the Department of Labor. Under the Federal Control Act creating the Fed eral Railway Administration for war purposes, a labor board exercised virtually absolute power. But, in the transporta
tion act (Esch-Cummins Act) of February 28, 1920, re storing the railroads to private control, the voluntary prin ciple was maintained. Provision was made for "Railroad Boards of Labor Adjustment" to be established by agreement between any carrier or group of carriers and employees; and for a supreme Railroad Labor Board of nine, three for each of the groups of management, labor, and public, with a central office at Chicago. If the decision of any of these boards is violated, apparently the utmost remedy of the Labor Board is to "make public its decision in such manner as it may determine." Great Britain, by the Industrial Courts Act of 1919, has provided for a central court to be appointed by the Minister of Labor, and for such other courts of in quiry as may be needed to take up particular labor disputes as they arise, on the principle of voluntary arbitration.
§ 13. Compulsory arbitration. The serious question in the subject of arbitration concerns the introduction of the principle of coercion by government, in compulsory arbitra tion. This, in principle, is pretty radically different from voluntary arbitration; for, as it denies to the parties the right to settle their dispute by private agreement, it becomes in effect the legal regulation of rates of wages and conditions of work. In principle this was involved in the regulation of wages in England from the fourteenth to the early part of the nineteenth centuries. The plan is approached in the indus trial courts that are now provided in a number of European countries for a cheap and expeditious settlement of small dis putes regarding trade matters, arising in the relations between employer and employees.
The new modern development began when New Zealand passed a compulsory arbitration act in 1894, followed to some extent since by all the other Australasian states, largely through the action of the labor party. Through the operation of its act, New Zealand came to be called the "land without strikes," though the description was in accurate, especially after 1907. The Canadian Industrial Dis putes Act of 1907 is an example that has had influence upon public opinion everywhere, and has been followed to some extent in recent legislation in New Zealand, America, and elsewhere. It involves the compulsory principle in a limited degree, making it unlawful in public utilities and mines to change the terms of employment without thirty days' notice, or to strike or lockout until after investigation and hearing before a board to be nominated for the purpose. The Colo rado Act of 1915 went even beyond the Canadian act in its scope.