His successor John XXII.
a native of Cahors, was elected as the result of very stormy negotiations, of ter a two years' vacancy of the see (1316). Like his predecessor he fixed his permanent residence at Avignon, where he had formerly been bishop. But while Clement V. had contented himself with the hospitality of the Dominican monastery at Avignon, John XXII. installed himself with great state in the episcopal palace, hard by the cathedral. The essential features of this new epoch in the history of the papacy, beginning with the two popes mentioned, are intimately connected with this lasting separation from the traditional seat of the papacy, and from Italian soil in general: a separation which reduced the head of the Church to a fatal dependence on the French kings. Themselves Frenchmen, and surrounded by a college of cardinals in which the French element predominated, the popes gave to their ecclesiastical administration a certain French character, till they stood in more and more danger of serving purely national in terests, in cases where the obligations of their office demanded complete impartiality. And thus the prestige of the papacy was sensibly diminished by the view, to which the jealousy of the na tions soon gave currency, that the supreme dignity of the Church was simply a convenient tool for French statecraft. The accusa tion might not always be supported by facts, but it tended to shake popular confidence in the head of the universal Church, and to inspire other countries with the feeling of a national opposition to an ecclesiastical regime now entirely Gallicized. The conse quent loosening of the ties between the individual provinces of the Church and the Apostolic See, combined with the capricious policy of the Court at Avignon, which often regarded nothing but per sonal and family interests, accelerated the decay of the ecclesiasti cal organism, and justified the most dismal forebodings for the future. To crown all, the feud between Church and Empire broke out again with unprecedented violence. The most prominent leaders of the opposition to the papacy, whether ecclesiastical or political, joined forces with the German king, Louis of Bavaria, and offered him their aid against John XXII. The clerical oppo sition was led by the very popular and influential Minorites who were at that time engaged in a remarkably bitter controversy with the pope as to the practical interpretation of the idea of evangeli cal poverty. Their influence can be clearly traced in the appeal to a general council, issued by Louis in 1324 at Sachsenhausen near Frankfurt-on-the-Main. This document, which confused the political problem with the theological, was bound to envenom the quarrel between emperor and pope beyond all remedy. Side by side with the Minorites, the spokesmen of the specifically political opposition to the papacy were the Parisian professors, Marsilius of Padua and John of Jandun, the composers of the Defender of the Peace (defensor pacis). In conjunction with the Minorites and the Ghibellines of Italy, Marsilius succeeded in enticing Louis to the fateful expedition to Rome and the revolutionary actions of 1328. The conferring of the imperial crown by the Roman populace, the deposition of the pope by the same body, -and the election of an anti-pope in the person of the Minorite Pietro da Corvara, translated into acts the doctrines of the defensor pacis. The struggle, which still further aggravated the dependence of the pope on France, was waged on both sides with the utmost bitterness, and the end was not in sight when John XXII. died, full of years, on Dec. 4,
Even the following pope, Benedict XII. (1334-1342), a man of the strictest morality, failed, in spite of his mild and pacific disposition, to adjust the conflict with Louis of Bavaria and the eccentric Fraticelli. King Philip VI. and the cardinals of the French party worked energetically against the projected peace with Louis; and Benedict was not endowed with sufficient strength of will to carry through his designs in the teeth of their opposition.
His efforts in the direction of reform, moreover, deserve recog nition. In Avignon he began to erect himself a suitable residence, which, with considerable additions by later popes, developed into the celebrated papal castle of Avignon.
Benedict XII. was also succeeded, in 1342, by a Frenchman from the south, Pierre Roger de Beaufort, who was born in the castle of Maumont, in the diocese of Limoges. He assumed the title of Clement VI. (1342-1352). In contrast with his peace
loving predecessor, and in accordance with his own more ener getic character, he pursued with decision and success the tradi tions of John XXII. in his dealings with Louis of Bavaria. With great dexterity he turned the feud between the houses of Luxem burg and Wittelsbach to the destruction of Louis; and the death struggle between the two seemed about to break out, when Louis met his untimely end. To all appearances the victory of the papacy was decisive : but it was a Pyrrhic victory, as events were quickly to prove. In Rome there ensued, during the pontificate of Clement, the revolutions of the visionary Cola di Rienzi (q.v.) who restored the old republic, though not for long. By his pur chase of Avignon, and the creation of numerous French cardinals, the pope consolidated the close connection of the Roman Church with France : but the interests of that church suffered severely through the riches and patronage which Clement lavished on his relatives, and through the princely luxury of his court.
It was fortunate for the Church that Clement VI. was followed by a man of an entirely different temperament—Innocent VI. (1352-1362). This strict and upright pope appears to have taken Benedict XII. for his example. He undertook, though not with complete success, a reformation of ecclesiastical abuses; and it was he who assisted in restoring the Empire at last to some measure of stability. But the culminating glory of his reign was the restoration of the almost ruined papal dominion in Italy, by means of the highly-gifted Cardinal Albornoz. The restoration of the Apostolic See to its original and proper seat was now pos sible ; and the need for such a step was the more pressing, since residence in the castle at Avignon had become extremely precari ous, owing to the ever-increasing confusion of French affairs.
The intention of Innocent was put into execution by his successor—the learned and pious Urban V. (1362-1370). Two events of the first magnitude make his reign one of the most memorable in the century. The first of these was the return to Rome. This was an object which the emperor Charles IV. had prosecuted with all his energies; which alone could revive the languishing reputation of the papacy, by with drawing it from the turmoils of the Anglo-French war, and bring within the bounds of possibility the much-needed reformation in ecclesiastical affairs. In 1367 it became an accomplished fact. Turning a deaf ear to the remonstrances of the French king and the French cardinals, the pope quitted Avignon on April 13, 1367 ; and on Oct. 16 he entered Rome, now completely fallen to ruin. The ensuing year, after his return to the Eternal City, wit nessed the second great landmark in the reign of Urban V.—the Roman expedition of Charles IV., and the renewal of amicable re lations between the Empire and the Church. Unfortunately, the pope failed to deal satisfactorily with the highly complicated situation in Italy ; and the result was that, on Sept. 27, 1370, he returned to Avignon, where he died on the following Dec. 19.
Gregory XI. (1370-1378), though equally distinguished for his erudition and pure morals, his piety, modesty and wisdom, was fated to pay dearly for the weakness of his predecessor in aban doning Rome so early. He lived to see the national spirit of Italy thoroughly aroused against a papacy turned French. The dis astrous error of almost exclusively appointing Provencals, f or eigners ignorant of both the country and the people, to the gov ernment of the Papal States, now found a terrible Nemesis : and there came a national upheaval, such as Italy had not yet wit nessed. The feud between Italian and Frenchman broke out in a violent form ; and it was in vain that St. Catherine of Siena proffered her mediation in the bloody strife betwixt the pope and the Florentine republic. The letters that she addressed to the pontiff, on this and other occasions, are documents, which are, per haps, unique in their kind, and of great literary beauty. It was also St. Catherine who prevailed on Gregory XI. to return to Rome. On Sept. 13, 1376, he left Avignon; on Jan. 17, 1377, he made his entry into the city of St. Peter. Thus ended the exile in France; but it left an evil legacy in the schism under Gregory's successor. Gregory, the last pope whom France has given to the Church, died on March 27, 1378, after taking measures to ensure a speedy and unanimous election for his successor.