Interior Boundaries

vol, united, york, boundary, american, pp, historical, history, washington and report

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Bibliography,— Exterior Boundaries.— Ad ams, Henry, (in American Historical Review, Vol. XVI, pp. 273-99, Jan uary 1911); Schuyler, R. L., 'Polk and the Oregon Compromise of 1846' (in Political Science Quarterly, Vol. XXVI, pp. 443-61, September 1911) ; Scaife, W. B.. (United States Census Bureau Bulle tin 74, Washington 1901); Winsor, Justin, 'Mississippi Basin) (Boston 1895), 'West ward Movement) (Boston 1897), graphical History of the Northeastern Bound (Cambridge 1887) and (ed.) 'Narra

tive and Critical History of America) (Vol. VII pp. 527-62, Boston 1:•:•:) .

nterior and State Boundaries.— Adams, H. B., 'Maryland's Influence in Founding a National Commonwealth> (in Maryland His torical Society Fund Publications, No. 11, Baltimore 1877); Alden, G. H. 'New Gov ernments West of the Alleghanies> (in Uni versity of Wisconsin Bulletins in Economics, Political Science and History, Vol. II, No. 1, Madison 1897); Battle, K. P. 'The Georgia Tennessee Boundary) (in Report of the Georgia Bar Association, 1901); Bowen, C. W., 'Boundary Disputes of Connecticut) (Boston 1882); Caffey, F. G., 'Annexation of West Florida to Alabama) (in Proceedings of the Alabama Bar Association, Vol. XIX, 1901); Farrand, Max, 'Indian Boundary (in American Historical Review, Vol. X, pp. 782-91, New York 1905); Gannett, Henry, (Boundaries of the United States and of the Several States and Territories) (United States Geological Survey Bulletin No. 226, Washington 1904); Green, S. A., 'The North ern Boundary of Massachusetts in its Rela tion to New Hampshire) (Worcester 1891); Goodloe, D. R., 'The North Carolina and Georgia Boundary) (Raleigh 1904); Hinsdale, B. A., 'The Old Northwest> (2d ed., New York 1899); Hyde, C. C., 'Notes on Rivers as Boundaries> (in American Journal of In ternational Law, Vol. VI, pp. 901-09, New York 1912); Larzelere, C. S., 'Boundaries of Michigan) (in Michigan Pioneer and His torical Society Collections, Vol. XXX, pp. 1-27, Lansing 1906); Lay, G. C., 'Historic Border Disputes between States of the Middle West> (in Journal of American History, Vol. V, pp. 274-92, New Haven 1911) and 'The Boundary Dispute between Washington and Oregon) (in Ibid, Vol VII, pp. 1153-67, Greenfield, Ind., 1913); Mason and Dixon Resurvey Commission, 'Report on the Re survey of the Maryland-Pennsylvania Bound ary> (1909); McClurg, 'The State of Louisiana versus the State of Mississippi> (in Mississippi Historical Society Publications, Vol. III) • New York Regents, 'Report on the Boundary of the State of New York) (1874-84) and on the New York and Pennsylvania Boundary) (1886); Noble, John, 'An Incident in the Boundary Line Dispute between Massachusetts and Rhode Island) (in (Massachusetts Historical Society Proceedings,' Series II, Vol. XIX, pp. 20 34, Boston 1906); Paxson, F. L., 'Boundaries of Colorado> (in University of Colorado Studies, Vol. II, No. 2, Boulder 1904); Riley, F. L., 'Boundaries of Mississippi) (in Mis sissippi Historical Society Publications, Vol. VIII) and 'Demarcation of the Mississippi Louisiana Boundary' (in Ibid, Vol. XI, Ox ford 1910); Shepherd, W. R., 'History At las) (New York 1911); Soule, A. N., 'South ern and Western Boundaries of Michigan' (in Michigan Political Science Association Proceedings, Vol. II, No. 2, Ann Arbor 1896) ; Thuaites, R. G., 'Boundaries of Wis consin) (in Wisconsin Historical Society Col lections, Vol. XI, pp. 451-501, Madison 1888); Texas Boundary Commission (Report) (House Ex. Doc. 21, 50th Congress, 1st ses sion, 1::7); Turner, F. J., 'Western State Making> (in American Historical Review, Vol. I, pp. 70, 251, 1895); Whealton, L. N., 'Maryland and Virginia Boundary Contro versy 1668-1894> (New York 1905); Way, W. V., 'The Facts and Historical Events of the Toledo War of 1835> (Toledo 1869); and the following cases before the United States Supreme Court and some of the State courts: Mo. vs. Iowa, 17 U. S., 337; Mo. vs. Kan., 312 U. S., 78; Mo. vs. Neb., 196 U. S., 23 and 197 U. S., 577; Mo. vs. Ky., 11 Wall., 395; R. I. vs. Mass. 12 U. S., 883; 13 U. S., 429; 14 U. S., 81; 16 U. S., 883; Iowa vs. Ill., 147 U. S., 1 7-14; 202 U. S., 59; Neb. vs. Iowa, 143 U. S., 359; Kan. vs. Col., 206 U. S., 46, 116; 185 U. S., 125; Ind. vs. Ky., 136 U. S., 479; Nielson vs. Ore., 212 U. S., 315; Wash. vs. Ore., 211 U. S., 127, 136; 214 U. S., 205; La. vs. Miss., 202 U. S., 1; Va. vs. W. Wa., 206 U. S., 290; 11 Wall, 39; Va. vs. Tenn., 148 U. S., 503; 191 U. S., 64; Ala. vs. Ga., 23 Howard, 505; Coffey vs. Groover, 123 U. S., 1 (Fla.-Ga.); Moore vs. McGuire, 205 U. S., 215 (Ark Miss.) ; La. vs. Texas, 176 U. S.; Stockley vs. Cissna, 119 Fed. Rep., 812; Handly.'s Lessee vs. Anthony, 5 Wheat., 374; Buttenuth vs. St. Louis Bridge Co., 123 Ill., 535; St. Louis vs. Rutz, 138 U. S., 226, 249; Norton vs. White side, 188 Fed. Rep., 356, 359; Cooley vs. Golden, 52 Mo. App., 229; McBane vs. John son, 155 Mo., 191; Keokuk and Hamilton Bridge Co. vs. The People, 145 Ill., 596; 167 III., 15; 175 U. S., 626; Morris vs. U. S., 174 U. S., 196; Md. vs. W. Va., 217 U. S., 1, 577.

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7