Home >> Institutes Of American Law >> Misdirection to Ohio >> Mistake

Mistake

ch, eq, id, jur and law

MISTAKE. Smine unintentional act, omission, or error arising from ignorance, sur prise, imposition, or misplaced confidence. Story, Eq. Jur. 110.

That result of ignorance of law or fact which has misled a person to commit that which, if he had not been in error he would not have done. Jeremy, Eq. Jur. 'b. 2, pt. 2, p. 358.

2. As a general rule, both at law and in equity, mistakes of law- do not furnish an ex cuse for wrongful acts or a ground of relief from $he consequences of acts done in conse quence of such a mistake. 6 Clark & F. Hou. L. 964-971 ; 9 Mees. & W. Exch. 54; 5 Hare, Ch. 91 ; 8 Wheat, 214 ; 1 Pet. 15 ; 9 How. 55 ; 7 Paige, Ch. N. Y. 99*, 137 ; 2 Johns. Ch. N. Y. 60 ; Story, Eq. Jur. ei 125— 138. See 2 M'Cord, Ch. 4.55 ; 6 Harr. & J. Md. 500 ; 25 Vt. 603 ; De Gex, M. & G. 76 ; 21 Ala. N. s. 252 ; 13 Ark. 129 ; 6 Ohio, 169 ; 11 id. 480; 21 Ga. 118 ; Beasl. Ch. N. J. 165.

An act done or a contract made under a mistake or ignorance of a material fact is voidable and relievable in equity. Story, Eq. Jur. 140. The rule applies to eases where there has been a studied suppression of facts by one side, and to cases of mutual ignorance or mistake. 3 Burr. 21 ; 26 Beav. Ras, 454 ; 12 Sim. Ch. 465; 9 Ves. Ch. 275 ; 3 Chanc. Cas. 56 ; 2 Barb. N. Y. 475 ; 1 Hill, N. Y. 287 ; 11 Pet. 71 ; 8 B. Monr. Ky. 580 ; 4 Mas. C. C. 414 ; 5 R. I. 130. But the fact must be material to the contract, i.e. essential to its character, and an efficient cause of its concoction. 1 Ves. Ch. 126, 210 ; De Gex &

S. 83 ; 6 Binn. Penn. 102 ; 11 Gratt. Va. 468; 2 Barb. N. Y. 37 ; 2 Sandf. Ch. N. Y. 298 ; 13 Penn. St. 371.

3. An avvard may be set aside for a mis take of law or fact by the arbitrators appa rent on the face of the award. 2 Bos. & P. 371 ; 1 Dall. Penn. 487; 1 Sneed, Tenn. 321. See 6 Mete. Mass. 136 ; 17 How. 344 ; 6 Pick. Mass. 148 2 Gall. C. C. 61 ; 4 N. H. 357 ; 3 Vt. 303 ; 6 id. 529 ; 15 Ill. 461 ; 2 Barnew. & Ald. 691 ; 3 id. 237 ; 1 Bingh. 104 ; 1 Dowl. & R. 366 ; 1 Taunt. 152 ; 6 id. 254 ; 3 C. B. 705 ; 2 Exch. 344 ; 3 East, 18.

The word which the parties intended to use in an instrument may be substituted for one which was actually used by a clerical error, in equity. Adams, Eq. 169 et seg. ; 13 Gray, Mass. 373 ; 6 Ired. Eq. No. C. 462 ; 17 Ala. N. s. 562.

As to the rule for the correction of mistakes in wills, see Story, Eq. Jur. 179; 2 Ves. Ch. 216; 3 id. 321 ; 1 Brown, Ch. 85 ; 3 id. 446; 1 Keen, 692 : 2 Kay & J. Ch. 740 ; 1 Jones, Eq. No. C. 1.10; 22 Mo. 518 ; 2 Stockt. Ch. N. J. 582.

A mistake sometimes prevents a forfeiture in cases of violation of revenue laws, Paine, C. C. 129 ; Gilp. Dist. Ct. 235 ; 4 Call, Va. 158 ; breach of embargo acts, 3 Day, Conn. 296 ; Paine, C. C. 16 ; 7 Cranch, 22 ; 3 Wheat. 59; 11 How. 47 ; and some other cases. 1 Bishop, Crim. Law, 697 ; 4 Cranch, 347 ; 11 Wheat. 1; 12 id. 1; 1 Mass. 347.