George Ii

GEORGE II. (George Augustus) (1683-1760, king of Great Britain and Ireland, the only son of George I., was born in 1683. In 1705 he married Wilhelmina Caroline of Anspach. In 1706 he was created earl of Cambridge. In 1708 he fought at Oude narde. It was most unwillingly that, on his first journey to Han over in 1716, George I., who was on bad terms with his son, ap pointed the prince of Wales guardian of the realm during his absence. In 1717 the existing ill-feeling ripened into an open breach. At the baptism of one of his children, the prince selected one godfather whilst the king persisted in selecting another. The young man spoke angrily, was ordered into arrest, and was sub sequently commanded to leave St. James's and to be excluded from all court ceremonies. The prince took up his residence at Leicester House, and did everything in his power to support the opposition against his father's ministers.

When therefore George I. died in 1727, it was generally sup posed that Walpole would be at once dismissed. The first direc tion of the new king was that Sir Spencer Compton would draw up the speech in which he was to announce to the privy council his accession. Compton, not knowing how to set about his task, applied to Walpole for aid. Queen Caroline took advantage of this evidence of incapacity, advocated Walpole's cause with her husband and procured his continuance in office. This curious scene was indicative of the course likely to be taken by the new sovereign. His own mind was incapable of rising above the merest details of business. He made war in the spirit of a drill sergeant, and he economized his income with the minute regu larity of a clerk. A blunder of a master of the ceremonies in marshalling the attendants on a levee put him out of temper. He took the greatest pleasure in counting his money piece by piece, and he never forgot a date. He was above all things methodical and regular. "He seems." said one who knew him well, "to think his having done a thing to-day an unanswerable reason for his doing it to-morrow." Most men so utterly immersed in details would be very im practicable to deal with. George II. was exempt from this failing. He seemed to have an instinctive understanding that such and such persons were either wiser or even stronger than himself, and when he had once discovered that, he gave way with scarcely a struggle. Though in his domestic relations he was as loose a liver as his father, he was guided by the wise, unobtrusive counsels of his wife until her death in 1737, and when once he had recognized Walpole's superiority he was guided by the political sagacity of the great minister. It is difficult to exaggerate the importance of such a temper upon the development of the constitution. The apathy of the nation in all but the most exciting political questions, fos tered by the calculated conservatism of Walpole, had thrown power into the hands of the great landowners. They maintained their authority by supporting a minister who was ready to make use of corruption, wherever corruption was likely to be useful, and who could veil over the baseness of the means which he em ployed by his talents in debate and in finance. To shake off a combination so strong would not have been easy. George II. submitted to it without a struggle.

So strong indeed had the Whig aristocracy grown that it began to lose its cohesion. Walpole dismissed all who opposed him. An opposition formidable in talents was gradually formed. In its composite ranks were Tories and discontented Whigs, dis carded official hacks hungry for the emoluments of office, and youthful purists who fancied that if Walpole were removed corruption would cease. Behind them was Bolingbroke, ex cluded from parliament but suggesting every party move. In 7 the opposition acquired the support of Frederick, prince of Wales. His marriage in 1736 to Augusta of Saxony brought on a quarrel with his father. In 1737, just as the princess of Wales was about to give birth to her first child, she was hurried away by her husband from Hampton court to St. James's palace at the imminent risk of her life, simply in order that the prince might show his spite to his father who had provided all necessary at tendance at the former place. George ordered his son to quit St. James's, and to absent himself from court. Frederick in dis grace gave the support of his name, and he had nothing else to give, to the opposition. Later in the year 7, on Nov. 20, Queen Caroline died. In 1742 Walpole, weighed down by the popularity both of his reluctance to engage in a war with Spain and of his supposed remissness in conducting the operations of that war, was driven from office. His successors formed a com posite ministry in which Walpole's old colleagues and opponents were alike to be found.

War of the Austrian Succession.

The years which followed settled conclusively, at least for this reign, the constitutional question of the power of appointing ministers. The war between Spain and England had broken out in In 1741 the death of the emperor Charles VI. brought on the War of the Austrian Succession. The position of George II. as a Hanoverian prince drew him to the side of Maria Theresa through jealousy of the rising Prussian monarchy. Jealousy of France led England in the same direction, and in 1741 a subsidy of £300,000 was voted to Maria Theresa. The king himself went to Germany, and at tempted to carry on the war according to his own notions. Those notions led him to regard the safety of Hanover as of far more importance than the wishes of England. Finding that a French army was about to march upon his German States, he concluded with France a treaty of neutrality for a year without consulting a single English minister. In England the news was received with feelings of disgust. The expenditure of English money and troops was to be thrown uselessly away as soon as it appeared that Hanover was in the slightest danger. In 1742 Walpole was no longer in office. Lord Wilmington, the nominal head of the min istry, was a mere cipher. The ablest and most energetic of his colleagues, Lord Carteret (afterwards Granville), attached him self specially to the king, and sought to maintain himself in power by his special favour and by brilliant achievements in diplomacy. In part at least by Carteret's mediation the peace of Breslau was signed, by which Maria Theresa ceded Silesia to Frederick ( July 28, 1742). Thus relieved on her northern frontier, she struck out towards the west. Bavaria was overrun by her troops. In the beginning of 1743 one French army was driven across the Rhine. On June 27th another French army was defeated by George II. at Dettingen. Victory brought elation to Maria The resa. Her war of defence was turned into a war of vengeance. Bavaria was to be annexed. The French frontier was to be driven back. George II. and Carteret after some hesitation placed them selves on her side. Of the public opinion of the political classes in England they took no thought. Hanoverian troops were indeed to be employed in the war, but they were to be taken into British pay. Collisions between British and Hanoverian officers were frequent. A storm arose against the preference shown to Han overian interests. After a brief struggle Carteret, now Lord Gran ville, was driven from office in Henry Pelham, who had become prime minister the year be fore, thus saw himself established in power. By the acceptance of this ministry, the king acknowledged that the function of choosing a ministry and directing a policy had passed from his hands. In 1745 indeed he recalled Granville, but a few days were sufficient to convince him of the futility of his attempt, and the effort to exclude Pitt at a later time proved equally fruitless.

Opposition to Pitt.—Important as were the events of the re mainder of the reign, therefore, they can hardly be grouped round the name of George II. The resistance to the invasion of the Young Pretender in 1745, the peace of Aix-la-Chapelle in 1748, the great war ministry of Pitt at the close of the reign, did not receive their impulse from him. He had indeed done his best to exclude Pitt from office. He disliked him on account of his op position in former years to the sacrifices demanded by the Han overian connection. When in 1756 Pitt became secretary of State in the Devonshire administration, the king bore the yoke with difficulty. Early in the next year he complained of Pitt's long speeches as being above his comprehension, and on April 5, he dismissed him, only to take him back shortly after, when Pitt, coalescing with Newcastle, became master of the situation.

Before Pitt's dismissal George II. had for once an opportunity of placing himself on the popular side, though, as was the case of his grandson during the American war, it was when the popu lar side happened to be in the wrong. In the true spirit of a martinet, he wished to see Admiral Byng executed. Pitt urged the wish of the House of Commons to have him pardoned. "Sir," replied the king, "you have taught me to look for the sense of my subjects in another place than in the House of Commons." When George II. died in 176o, he left behind him a settled under standing that the monarchy was one of the least of the forces by which the policy of the country was directed. To this end he had contributed much by his disregard of English opinion in but it may fairly be added that, but for his readiness to give way to irresistible adversaries, the struggle might have been far more bitter and severe than it was.

Of the connection between Hanover and England in this reign two memorials remain more pleasant to contemplate than the records of parliamentary and ministerial intrigues. With the support of George II., amidst the derision of the English fashion able world, the Hanoverian Handel produced in England those masterpieces which have given delight to millions, whilst the foundation of the University of Gottingen by the same king opened a door through which English political ideas afterwards penetrated into Germany.

George II. had three sons, Frederick Louis (17o7-51) ; George William (1717-18) ; and William Augustus, duke of Cumberland (1721-65) ; and five daughters, Anne , married to William, prince of Orange, 1734 ; Amelia Sophia Eleonora (1711 1786) ; Elizabeth Caroline 0713-1757) ; Mary (1723-72), mar ried to Frederick, landgrave of Hesse-Cassel, 174o; Louisa ' 751), married to Frederick V., king of Denmark, (S. R. G.) BIBLIOGRAPHY.-See Earl Stanhope, History of England from the Bibliography.-See Earl Stanhope, History of England from the Peace of Utrecht to the Peace of Versailles vol. I. (7 vol. 1836-54 3rd ed., rev., ; Horace Walpole, Memoirs of the Reign of King George II. (ed. Lord Holland 1846. 2nd ed. rev., "1847) ; Lord Hervey, Memoirs of the Reign of George 11., from his accession to the death of Queen Caroline 2 vol. (ed. J. W. Croker, 1848, new ed., 3 vol. 1884) ; W. E. H. Lecky, A History of England in the eighteenth century (1878-90, new ed., 7 vol. 1892) ; J. MacCarthy, A History of the Four Georges 4 vol. (1884-1901, new ed., 2 vol. in St. Martin's Library, 1905) ; R. J. Lucas, George II. and his Ministers (191o).