HOGARTH, WILLIAM (1697-1764), the great English painter and pictorial satirist, was born at Bartholomew Close in London on Nov. io, 1697. His father, Richard Hogarth, who died in 1718, was a school-master and literary hack, who had come to the metropolis to seek that fortune which had been denied to him in his native Westmorland. The son seems to have been early distinguished by a talent for drawing and an active per ceptive faculty rather than by any close attention to learning. "Shows of all sorts gave me uncommon pleasure when an infant," he says, "and mimicry, common to all children, was remarkable in me. . . . My exercises when at school were more remarkable for the ornaments which adorned them than for the exercise itself." This being the case, he was apprenticed to a silver-plate engraver, Mr. Ellis Gamble, at the sign of the "Golden Angel" in Cran bourne street or Alley, Leicester Fields. For this master he en graved a shop-card which is still extant. His apprenticeship must have been concluded before the beginning of 1720, for in April of that year he appears to have set up as engraver on his own account. His desires, however, were not limited to silver-plate engraving. "Engraving on copper was, at 20 years of age, my utmost ambi tion." For this he lacked the needful skill as a draughtsman; and his account of the means which he took to supply this want, without too much interfering with his pleasure, is thoroughly characteristic. "Laying it down," he says, "first as an axiom, that he who could by any means acquire and retain in his memory, perfect ideas of the subjects he meant to draw, would have as clear a knowledge of the figure as a man who can write freely hath of the twenty-four letters of the alphabet and their infinite combinations (each of these being composed of lines), and would consequently be an accurate designer, . . . I therefore endeav oured to habituate myself to the exercise of a sort of technical memory, and by repeating in my own mind, the parts of which objects were composed, I could by degrees combine and put them down with my pencil." There is little doubt that his marvellous power of seizing expression owed less to patient academical study than to his unexampled eye-memory and tenacity of minor detail. But he was not without technical training, since he is known to have studied at Sir James Thornhill's then recently opened art school.
"His first employment" after he set up for himself "seems," says John Nichols, in his Anecdotes, "to have been the engraving of arms and shop bills." After this he was employed in designing "plates for booksellers." "Masquerades and Operas" (1724), the first plate he published on his own account, is a clever little satire on contemporary follies, such as the masquerades of the Swiss adventurer Heidegger, the popular Italian opera-singers, Rich's pantomimes at Lincoln's Inn Fields, and the exaggerated popularity of Lord Burlington's protege, the architect painter William Kent, who is here represented on the summit of Burling ton Gate, with Raphael and Michelangelo for supporters. This worthy Hogarth had doubtless not learned to despise less in the school of his rival Sir James Thornhill. Indeed almost the next of Hogarth's important prints was aimed at Kent alone, being that memorable burlesque of the unfortunate altarpiece designed by the latter for St. Clement Danes, which, in deference to the ridi cule of the parishioners, Bishop Gibson took down in 1725. Hogarth's squib, which appeared subsequently, exhibits it as a very masterpiece of confusion and bad drawing. In 1726 he prepared twelve large engravings for Butler's Hudibras. These he himself valued highly, and they are the best of his book illus trations.
In 1727, Hogarth was engaged by Joshua Morris, a tapestry worker, to prepare a design for the "Element of Earth." Morris, however, having heard that he was "an engraver, and no painter," declined the work when completed, and Hogarth accordingly sued him for the money in the Westminster Court, where, on May 23, 1728, the case was decided in Hogarth's favour. It may have been the aspersion thus early cast on his skill as a painter (coupled perhaps with the unsatisfactory state of print-selling, owing to the uncontrolled circulation of piratical copies) that induced him to turn his attention to the production of "small conversation pieces" (i.e., groups in oil of full-length portraits from 12 to 15 in. high), many of which are still preserved in different collections. "This," he says, "having novelty, succeeded for a few years." Among his other efforts in oil between 1728 and 1732 were "The Wanstead Conversation," "The House of Commons examining Bambridge," an infamous warden of the Fleet, and several pictures of the chief actors in Gay's popular Beggar's Opera.
On March 23, 1729 he was married at old Paddington church to Jane Thornhill, the only daughter of Sir James Thornhill. The match was a clandestine one. We next hear of him in "lodgings at South Lambeth," where he rendered some assistance to the then well-known Jonathan Tyers, who opened Vauxhall in 1732 with an entertainment styled a ridotto al fresco. For these gardens Hogarth painted a poor picture of Henry VIII. and Anne Boleyn, and he also permitted Hayman to make copies of the later series of the "Four Times of the Day." In return, the grateful Tyers presented him with a gold pass ticket "In perpetuain Beneficii Memoriam." It was long thought that Hogarth designed this himself. Mr. Warwick Wroth (Numismatic Chronicle, vol. xviii.) doubts this, although he thinks it probable that Hogarth designed some of the silver Vauxhall passes which are figured in Wilkin son's Londina illustrata. The only engravings between 1726 and 1732 which need be referred to are the "Large Masquerade Ticket" (1727), another satire on masquerades, and the print of "Burlington Gate" (1731), evoked by Pope's Epistle to Lord Burlington, and defending Lord Chandos, who is therein satirized. This print gave great offence, and was, it is said, suppressed.
By 1 731 Hogarth completed the earliest of the series of moral works which first gave him his position as an original genius. This was "A Harlot's Progress." Almost immediately afterwards he must have begun to engrave them—a task he had at first intended to leave to others. From an advertisement in the Country Journal; or, the Craftsman, Jan. 29, 1732, the pictures were then being engraved, and from later announcements it seems clear that they were delivered to the subscribers early in the following April, on the 21st of which month an unauthorized prose description of them was published. We have no record of the particular train of thought which prompted these story-pictures; but it may perhaps be fairly assumed that the necessity for creating some link of interest between the personages of the little "conversation pieces" above referred to, led to the further idea of connecting several groups or scenes so as to form a sequent narrative. "I wished," says Hogarth, "to compose pictures on canvas, similar to representations on the stage." "I have endeavoured," he says again, "to treat my subject as a dramatic writer; my picture is my stage, and men and women my players, who by means of certain actions and gestures are to exhibit a dumb show." There was never a more eloquent dumb show than this of the "Harlot's Progress." In six scenes the miserable career of a woman of the town is traced out remorselessly from its first facile beginning to its degraded end. Nothing of the detail is softened, the whole is acted out with the hard, uncompassionate morality of the age the painter lived in, while the introduction here and there of one or two well-known characters such as Colonel Charteris and Justice Gonson give a vivid reality to the satire. It had an immediate success. To say nothing of the fact that the talent of the paintings completely reconciled Sir James Thornhill to the son-in-law he had hitherto refused to acknowledge, more than 1,200 names of subscribers to the engravings were entered in the artist's book. On the appearance of plate iii. the lords of the treasury trooped to the print shop for Sir John Gonson's portrait which it contained.
The story was made into a pantomime by Theophilus Cibber, and by some one else into a ballad opera ; and it gave rise to numerous pamphlets and poems. It was painted on fan-mounts and trans ferred to cups and saucers. Lastly, it was freely pirated. There could be no surer testimony to its popularity.
From the mss. of George Vertue in the British Museum (Add. mss. 23,069-98) it seems that during the progress of the plates, Hogarth was domiciled with his father-in-law, Sir James Thorn hill, in the Middle Piazza, Covent Garden (the "second house eastward from James Street"), and it must have been thence that set out the historical expedition from London to Sheerness of which the original record still exists at the British Museum. This is an oblong ms. volume entitled An Account of what seem'd most. Remarkable in the Five Days' Peregrination of the Five. Following Persons, vizt., Messieurs Tothall, Scott, Hogarth, Thornhill and Forrest. Begun on Saturday May 27th 1732 and Finish'd On the 31st of the Same Month. Abi to et fac similiter. Inscription on Dulwich College Porch. The journal, which is written by Ebenezer, the father of Garrick's friend Theodosius Forrest, gives a good idea of what a "frisk"—as Johnson called it —was in those days, while the illustrations were by Hogarth and Samuel Scott the landscape painter. John Thornhill, Sir James's son, made the map. This version (in prose) was subsequently run into rhyme by one of Hogarth's friends, the Rev. Wm. Gost ling of Canterbury, and after the artist's death both versions were published. In the absence of other biographical detail, they are of considerable interest to the student of Hogarth. In Hogarth moved into the "Golden Head" in Leicester Fields, which, with occasional absences at Chiswick, he continued to occupy until his death. By December of this year he was already engaged upon the engravings of a second Progress, that of a Rake. It was not as successful as its predecessor. It was in eight plates in lieu of six. The story is unequal; but there is nothing finer than the figure of the desperate hero in the Covent Garden gaming-house, or the admirable scenes in the Fleet prison and Bedlam, where at last his headlong career comes to its tragic termination. The plates abound with allusive suggestion and covert humour.
"A Rake's Progress" was dated June 25, 1735, and the engrav ings bear the words "according to Act of Parliament." This was an act (8 Geo. II. cap. 13) which Hogarth had been instrumental in obtaining from the legislature, being stirred thereto by the shameless piracies of rival printsellers. Although loosely drawn, it served its purpose ; and the painter commemorated his success by a long inscription on the plate entitled "Crowns, Mitres, etc.," afterwards used as a subscription ticket to the Election series. These subscription tickets to his engravings, let us add, are among the brightest and most vivacious of the artist's productions. That to the "Harlot's Progress" was entitled "Boys peeping at Nature," while the "Rake's Progress" was heralded by the delightful etching known as "A Pleased Audience at a Play, or The Laughing Audience." Of the prints which followed the two Progresses, "A Modern Midnight Conversation," is an admirable drinking scene which comes between them in 1733, and the bright little plate of "South wark Fair" although dated 1733, was published with "A Rake's Progress" in 1735. Between these and "Marriage a la mode," upon the pictures of which the painter must have been not long after at work, come the small prints of the "Consultation of Physicians" and "Sleeping Congregation" (1736), the "Scholars at a Lecture" ('737) ; the "Four Times of the Day" (1738) , a series of pictures of 18th century life, the earlier designs for which have been already referred to; the "Strolling Actresses dressing in a Barn" (1738), which Walpole held to be, "for wit and imagination, with out any other end, the best of all the painter's works"; and finally the admirable plates of the Distrest Poet painfully composing a poem on "Riches" in a garret, and the Enraged Musician ful minating from his parlour window upon a discordant orchestra of knife-grinders, milk-girls, ballad-singers and the rest upon the pave ment outside. These are dated respectively 1736 and 1741. To this period also (i.e., the period preceding the production of the plates of "Marriage a la mode") belong two of those history pic tures to which, in emulation of the Haymans and Thornhills, the artist was continually attracted. "The Pool of Bethesda" and the "Good Samaritan," "with figures 7 ft. high," were painted circa 1736, and presented by the artist to St. Bartholomew's hospital where they remain. They were not masterpieces; and it is pleas anter to think of his connection with Captain Coram's recently established Foundling hospital (1739), which he aided with his money, his graver and his brush, and for which he painted that admirable portrait of the good old philanthropist which is now loaned to the National Gallery, London.
In "A Harlot's Progress" Hogarth had not strayed much beyond the lower walks of society, and in "A Rake's Progress," his hero was taken from the middle classes. His masterpiece, "Marriage a la mode," successfully depicted, as the advertisement has it, "a variety of modern occurrences in high life." The countess's bed room, the earl's apartment with its lavish coronets and old masters, the grand saloon with its marble pillars and grotesque ornaments, are fully as true to nature as the frowsy chamber in the "Turk's Head Bagnio," the quack-doctor's museum in St. Martin's Lane, or the mean opulence of the merchant's house in the city. The engravings of "Marriage a la mode" were dated April Al though by this time the painter found a ready market for his engravings, he does not appear to have been equally successful in selling his pictures. The people bought his prints; but the richer and not, numerous connoisseurs who purchased pictures were wholly in the hands of the importers and manufacturers of "old masters." In Feb. 1745 the original oil paintings of the two Progresses, the "Four Times of the Day" and the "Strolling Actresses" were still unsold. On the last day of that month Hogarth disposed of them by an ill-devised kind of auction, the details of which may be read in Nichols's Anecdotes, for the paltry sum of £427 7s. No better fate attended "Marriage a la mode," which six years later became the property of Lane of Hillingdon for 120 guineas. Something of this was no doubt due to Hogarth's impracticable arrangements, but the fact shows how blind his contemporaries were to his merits as a painter, and how hopelessly in bondage to the all-powerful picture-dealers. Of these latter the painter himself gave a graphic picture in a letter ad dressed by him under the pseudonym of "Britophil" to the St. James's Evening Post, in June '737.
But if Hogarth was not successful with his dramas on canvas, he occasionally shared with his contemporaries in the popularity of portrait painting. For a picture, executed in 1746, of Garrick as Richard III. he was paid £200, "which was more," says he, "than any English artist ever received for a single portrait." In the same year a sketch of Simon Fraser, Lord Lovat, afterwards beheaded on Tower Hill, had an exceptional success.
Other important works are "The Stage Coach or Country Inn Yard" (1747) ; the series of 12 plates entitled "Industry and Idleness" (1747), depicting the career of two London appren tices; the "Gate of Calais" (1749), which had its origin in a rather unfortunate visit paid to France by the painter after the peace of Aix-la-Chapelle; the "March to Finchley" (175o) ; "Beer Street," "Gin Lane" and the "Four Stages of Cruelty" (I 751) ; the admirable representations of election humours in the days of Sir Robert Walpole, entitled "Four Prints of an Election" (1755 17S8) ; and the plate of "Credulity, Superstition and Fanaticism, a Medley" (1762), adapted from an earlier unpublished design called "Enthusiasm Delineated." Besides these must be chronicled three more essays in the "great style of history painting," viz. "Paul before Felix," "Moses brought to Pharaoh's Daughter" and the Altarpiece for St. Mary Redcliffe at Bristol. The first two were engraved in 1751-1752, the last in 1794. A subscription ticket to the earlier pictures, entitled "Paul before Felix Burlesqued," had a popularity far greater than that of the prints themselves.
In 1745 Hogarth painted that admirable portrait of himself with his dog Trump, which is now in the Tate gallery. In a corner of this he had drawn on a palette a serpentine curve with the words "The Line of Beauty." Much inquiry ensued as to the meaning of this hieroglyphic ; and in an unpropitious hour the painter resolved to explain himself in writing. The result was the well-known Analysis of Beauty (1753), a treatise to fix "the fluctuating ideas of Taste," otherwise a desultory essay having for pretext the precept attributed to Michelangelo that a figure should be always "Pyramidall, Serpent like and multiplied by one two and three." By the painter's adherents it was praised as a final deliverance upon aesthetics; by his enemies and professional rivals, its obscurities, and minor errors were made the subject of ridicule. Moreover, there were further humiliations in store for him. In 1759 the success of a little picture called "The Lady's Last Stake," painted for Lord Charlemont, procured him a com mission from Sir Richard Grosvenor to paint another picture "upon the same terms." Unhappily on this occasion he deserted his own field of genre and social satire, to select the story from Boccaccio (or rather Dryden) of Sigismunda weeping over the heart of her murdered lover Guiscardo, being the subject of a picture in Sir Luke Schaub's collection by Furini which had recently been sold for £400. The picture, over which he spent much time and patience, was not regarded as a success; and Sir Richard rather meanly shuffled out of his bargain upon the plea that "the constantly having it before one's eyes, would be too often occasioning melancholy ideas to arise in one's mind." Sigis munda, therefore, remained upon his hands. It is now in the Tate gallery.
Hogarth's last years were embittered by an unhappy quarrel with his quondam friends, John Wilkes and Churchill the poet. Having succeeded John Thornhill in 1757 as serjeant painter (to which post he was reappointed at the accession of George III.), an evil genius prompted him in 1762 to do some "timed" thing in the ministerial interest, and he accordingly published the in different satire of "The Times, plate i." This at once brought him into collision with Wilkes and Churchill, and the immediate result was a violent attack upon him, both as a man and an artist, in the opposition North Briton, No. 17. The old artist was deeply wounded, and his health was failing. Early in the next year, however, he replied by that portrait of Wilkes which will for ever carry his squinting features to posterity. Churchill re taliated in July by a savage Epistle to William Hogarth, to which the artist rejoined by a print of Churchill as a bear, in torn bands and ruffles. "The pleasure, and pecuniary advantage," writes Hogarth manfully, "which I derived from these two engravings" (of Wilkes and Churchill), "together with occasionally riding on horseback, restored me to as much health as can be expected at my time of life." He produced but one more print, that of "Finis, or The Bathos," March 1764, a strange jumble of "fag ends," intended as a tail-piece to his collected prints; and on Oct. 26 of the same year he died at his house in Leicester Square. He was buried in Chiswick churchyard, where a tomb was erected to him by his friends in 1771, with an epitaph by Garrick. Not far off, on the road to Chiswick Gardens, still stands the little red-brick Georgian villa in which from Sept. 1749 until his death he spent the summer seasons. It was purchased in 19o2 by Lieut.-Colonel Shipway of Chiswick, who turned it into a Hogarth museum.
As a painter Hogarth was harmonious in his colouring, wonder fully dexterous and direct in his handling, and in his composition. As an engraver his work is more conspicuous for its vigour, spirit and intelligibility than for finish and beauty of line. He desired that it should tell its own tale plainly, and in this he succeeded. But it is not as an engraver or a painter that he claims his unique position among English artists—it is as a humorist and a satirist upon canvas. Regarded in this light he has never been equalled, whether for his vigour of realism and dramatic power, his fancy and invention in the decoration of his story, or his merciless anatomy and exposure of folly and wickedness. If we regard him— as he loved to regard himself—as "author" rather than "artist," his place is with the great masters of literature,—with the Thack erays and Fieldings, the Cervantes and Molieres.
main body of Hogarth literature is to be found in the autobiographical Memoranda published by John Ireland in 1798, and in the successive Anecdotes of the antiquary John Nichols. Much minute information has also been collected in F. G. Stephens's Cata logue of the Satirical Prints and Drawings in the British Museum. But a copious bibliography of books, pamphlets, etc., relating to Hogarth, together with detailed catalogues of his paintings and prints, will be found in the Memoir of Hogarth by Austin Dobson. First issued in 1879, this was reprinted and expanded in 1891, 1897, 1902 and finally in 1907. A number of pictures by Hogarth are in private hands in Eng land and the United States ; but most of the best-known works have permanent homes in public galleries. "Marriage a la mode," "Sigis munda," "Lavinia Fenton," the "Scene from the Beggar's Opera," the portraits of himself, his sister Mary and Dr. Hoadley are at the Tate gallery ; the "Shrimp Girl," the "Gate of Calais," the "Family Group," the portraits of James Quin, his sister Ann, and his servants, are in the National Gallery ; the "Rake's Progress" and the Election Series, in the Soane museum. There are also notable pictures in the Fitzwilliam museum at Cambridge and the National Portrait Gallery. At the print room in the British Museum there is also a very interesting set of 16 designs for the series called "Industry and Idleness," the majority of which formerly belonged to Horace Walpole. (A. Do. ; X.)