ASIANIC LANGUAGES. The languages described as Asianic were spoken in Asia Minor by non-Hellenic peoples before the arrival of Greek, by which most of them have been slowly ousted or absorbed. The term is purely geographical and comprises a number of ancient languages, of different families and modes of writing whose only common feature is their obscurity. They are mainly (I) recorded in cuneiform, as Sumerian (q.v.), Hittite Cassite, Vannic and Elamite; or (2) languages whose name alone survives, as Pisidian, Lycaonian, Cappadocian, Paphlagonian, Phrygian (an Indo-European language) ; and (3) the speech of the peoples of the coast of Asia Minor, Mysian, Lydian (Maiones), Carian and Lydian (Termiles), recorded by alphabets akin to or derived from the Greek.
Lydian.—Excavations conducted by the American school, 1910-13, produced numerous inscriptions dating from the 5th and 4th centuries B.c. written in an alphabet closely resembling the Greek, usually from right to left. Mostly funerary inscrip tions, they contain with variations the common formula—"This is the tomb of X son of Y. May he who damages it be punished by the divinity, himself and his family." We have a few short bilingual (Greek and Lydian) inscriptions and one (Lydian Aramaic) dating 455 or 394 or 349 B.c. which, despite many ob scurities, is the basis of our decipherment and interpretation. We have a fairly accurate knowledge of Lydian, although the value of some signs is problematic and the greater part of the vocabulary re mains unknown, while the longest texts available, metrical in scriptions from Sardis, are still a riddle.
Phonetics.—Lydian has the vowels, a, e, o and u; nasalized vowels a, é; an aspirate h, two i's, one plain and one rolled, two series of occlusives, surd and sonor, with an absence of aspirated occlusives. There are accumulations of consonants due perhaps to habits in writing or perhaps indicating a modification of the short vowels, possibly the result of accent.
Grammar.—Nouns seemingly have two genders and three cases in the singular, less certainly in the plural. The nominative masculine and feminine in the singular is -s for roots in -i and -s in others. The oblique case (dative and perhaps locative) is -X and the accusative -n as also probably the oblique plural. Demonstra tives and adjectives have the case forms as the nouns to which they belong. Thus the demonstrative es- is in the masculine feminine nominative es-.'s which becomes ess; in the neuter it is es-d becoming est; thus we have eh' vanas, this tomb, and est mrud, this monument. In all genders the form es X is used in oblique cases. Possession is indicated by an adjective in -1- which can be associated with the oblique case form -X and takes the same case forms as the noun. Thus vanas Atalis, the tomb of Atas. Verbal forms are less clear. Lydian seems to have had a third person singular form in -d and a third person plural form in -ent. The numerals are not known. The post-position -k means `and' as -c in Etruscan. Negative forms are nik . . . nik, neither . . . nor, and a negative or indefinite element /id- combines with the pronoun pis, pid forming napis, rapid somebody, something. The alternative buk means or, and the conditional form is ak in the protasis, sometimes lengthened to skit or by adding it-in to aktin, while fak, then, introduces the leading element in the apodosis. The order of words is subject, verb, object. The exact meaning of individual words is not known save in a few cases such as the words for tomb, monument, court, house, water, fire, priest, divinity, destroy, with a certain number of words explained by glosses.
Carian.—Our knowledge of Carian rests on about 8o small inscriptions recorded in an alphabet containing several signs identi cal with Greek forms. The earliest date from the middle of the 7th century B.C., and three are bilingual, Egypto-Carian. De cipherment is still uncertain, and the meaning of a large number of the signs is conjectural despite the work of Sayce. Herodotus mentions the tradition that the Carians were once the inhabitants of the islands. Sundwall with some probability relates Carian to Lycian. The evidence is, however, based on place-names and on the glosses recorded mainly by Stephen of Byzantium. The ma terial does not enabli; us to verify the association of Carian with Cretan or the relationship of Carians to Mysians and Lydians.
Lycian.—Discoveries made over the last century from 1811 onwards have brought to light abou,. 150 inscriptions dating from the 5th and 4th centuries B.C. written in an alphabet of Greek origin, which come mainly from Limyra, Xanthos, Myra, Pinara and Tlos. Nearly all are funeral inscriptions and uniform in pur port and language except the second part of the long stele of Xanthos and the inscription of Antiphellos which are metrical in an archaic, perhaps different, dialect and much more obscure. A few very short and varying bilingual (Greco-Lycian) inscriptions give some help towards interpretation.
Phonetics.—Lycian possessed as vowels, a, e, i (marked e), u (marked o), nasalized vowels sonants w and y, a series of occlusives in frequent alternation, like land r, sign in and n whose value is doubtful, two spirants, x and 0, two sibilants s and z and the aspirate h. An equivalence of e, or a is found but not ex plained. A few signs have not been surely identified.
Grammar.—Two genders seem to have existed with a de clension with a nominative, an oblique case in -i (plural and an accusative with nasalization. The possessive of the 1st person is emi or mine. The relative is ti. In the verb the singular third person was, it seems, t or d, and the third person plural was nt and there was a vowel conjugation, the timbre of the vowel varying with the variations of time. The usual negative form is ne, ni. A certain number of words have been elucidated by the bilingual inscriptions so that the meaning of certain phrases can be es tablished with some accuracy, although it is as yet impossible to deal satisfactorily with the larger inscriptions.
Affinities of the Asianic Languages.—As to the relation ship of these languages to one another, all that can be said is that they have certain identical tendencies in pronunciation, in nasalized vowels, which prove nothing, some grammatical coin cidences (accusative in -ii; verb forms for the third person in -t and -nt) which are of little aid. Neither Lydian nor Lycian dis play any certain marks of relationship. Their vocabularies are very different, a fact which does not prevent their having a com mon origin. Too little is known of Carian, which must be omitted, and as regards Lydian and Lycian such facts as we have do not as yet indicate a close affinity. Fundamental resemblances have been found between Lydian and Indo-European, such as case forms, the adjectival concord, the system of relative and demon strative pronouns, the verbal forms for the third person, singular and plural, the negative forms. On the other hand, not one Lydian word has a clear Indo-European origin and the oblique case in X is definitely alien to Indo-European declension though known in Etruscan and the southern Caucasus. Lycian has similar but less numerous points of likeness and many features in it are common in Etruscan (q.v.), such as a large number of proper names, some words and elements of common derivation. If these lan guages are really to be regarded as related and if we may apply to them the term "Asianic family," which is probable, though not proved, their position with regard to Indo-European languages (q.v.) may be that they have retained some features of their corn mon origin but have from early times diverged independently similarly as regards the relationship with Etruscan and the south ern Caucasus, unless the features shared with these languages are accidental. But before this or any other hypothesis can be taken as beyond doubt, more investigations are necessary.
The philosophy of "as if" traces its descent from Kant, through Lange (the historian of materialism) and Nietzsche. Kant, by limiting human knowledge to phenomena, that is, to things as they appear to man, not as they are in themselves, and by regard ing human knowledge as moulded by certain a priori forms innate in the human mind, obviously, if unintentionally, gave an impulse to the philosophy of "as if." Nietzsche promptly pointed out that other beings than man may have other a priori forms of appre hending reality, and that the human forms of apprehension instead of revealing the true nature of reality may only conceal it in order to make human existence tolerable. The whole philosophy of "as if" may be regarded as one expression of the sceptical and agnostic tendencies of the age, of which pragmatism and hominism are other expressions.
See H. Vaihinger, The Philosophy of "As if" (English trans., 1926) .