BOOK-PLATES. The book-plate, or ex-libris, a printed label intended to indicate ownership in books, is nearly as old as the printed book. According to Friedrich Warnecke, of Berlin (one of the best authorities on the subject), the oldest movable ex-libris are certain woodcuts representing a shield of arms supported by an angel (fig. I), which were pasted in books presented to the Carthusian monastery of Buxheim by Brother Hildebrand Bran denburg of Biberach, about the year 148o—the date being fixed by that of the recorded gift. The woodcut, in imitation of similar devices in old mss., is hand-painted. Many other authorities claim that there is another which antedates the Brandenburg. It is that of Johannes Knabensberg (called Hans Igler), chaplain of the family of Schiinstett. It is a woodcut found in an old Latin vocabulary. Some authorities date it c. 145o, others c. 147o-80. In France the most ancient ex-libris as yet discovered is that of one Jean Bertaud de la Tour-Blanche, dated 1529; and in England that of Cardinal Wolsey, 1515-34. Holland comes next with the plate of a certain Anna van der Aa, in 1597; then Italy with one attributed to the year 1622. The earliest known American example is the plain printed label of John Cotton, 1674 A sketch of the history of the book-plate must obviously begin in Germany, not only because the earliest examples known are German, but also because they are found in great numbers—often of the highest artistic interest—long before the fashion spread to other countries. Albrecht Diirer is known to have actually en graved at least six plates (some of very important size) between 5o3 and 1516 (fig. 2), and to have supplied designs for many others. Severai notable plates are ascribed to Lucas Cranach and to Hans Holbein, and to that bevy of so-called Little Masters, the Behams, Virgil Solis, Matthias, Zundt, Jost Amman, Saldorfer, Georg Hiipschmann and others. The influence of these draughts men over the decorative styles of Germany has been felt through subsequent centuries down to the present day, notwithstanding the invasion of successive Italian and French fashions during the i7th and i8th centuries, and the marked effort at originality of composition observable among modern designers. The heavy, over-elaborated German style never seems to have affected neigh bouring countries ; but since it was undoubtedly from Germany that was spread the fashion of ornamental book-plates as marks of possession, the history of German ex-libris remains on that account one of high interest to all those who are curious in the matter.
The main styles of decoration (and these, other data being absent, must always in the case of old examples remain the criteria of date) have already been noticed. It is, however, necessary to point out that certain styles of composition were also prevalent at certain periods. Many of the older plates (like the majority of the most modern ones) were essentially pictorial. Of this kind the best-defined English genus may be recalled : the library interior— a term which explains itself—and book-piles, exemplified by the ex-libris (fig. 3) of W. Hewer, Samuel Pepys's secretary. We have also many portrait-plates, of which, perhaps, the most notable are those of Samuel Pepys himself and of John Gibbs, the architect; allegories, such as were engraved by Hogarth, Bartolozzi, John Pine and George Vertue ; landscape-plates, by wood engravers of the Bewick school (see PLATE), etc. In most of these the armorial element plays but a secondary part.
The value attached to book-plates, otherwise than as an object of purely personal interest, is comparatively modern. The study of and the taste for collecting these private tokens of book ownership hardly date farther back than the year 1875. The first real impetus was given by the appearance of the Guide to the Study of Book-Plates, by Lord de Tabley (then the Hon. Leicester Warren) in 1880. This work, highly interesting from many points of view, established what is now accepted as the general classifi cation of styles : early armorial (i.e., previous to Restoration, exemplified by the Nicholas Bacon plate) ; Jacobean, a somewhat misleading term, but distinctly understood to include the heavy decorative manner of the Restoration, Queen Anne and early Georgian days (the Lansanor plate, fig. 3, is typically Jacobean) ; Chippendale (the style above described as rococo, represented by the French plate of Conyers) ; wreath and ribbon, belonging to the period described as that of the urn, etc. Since then the litera ture on the subject has grown considerably. Societies of collectors have been founded, first in England, then in Germany and France, and in the United States, most of them issuing a journal or ar chives : The Journal of the Ex-libris Society (London), the Ar chives de la societe francaise de collectionneurs d'ex-libris (Paris), both of these monthlies; the Ex-libris Zeitschrift (Berlin), a quar terly.
Until the advent of the new taste the devising of book-plates was almost invariably left to the routine skill of the heraldic stationer. Of late years the composition of personal book-tokens has become recognized as a minor branch of a higher art, and there has come into fashion an entirely new class of designs which, for all their wonderful variety, bear as unmistakable a character as that of the most definite styles of bygone days. Broadly speak ing, it may be said that the purely heraldic element tends to become subsidiary and the allegorical or symbolic to assert itself more strongly. Among modern English artists who have more specially paid attention to the devising of book-plates, and have produced admirable designs, may be mentioned C. W. Sherborn, G. W. Eve, Robert Anning Bell, J. D. Batten, Erat Harrison, J. Forbes Nixon, Charles Ricketts, John Vinycomb, John Leighton and Warrington Hogg. The development in various directions of process work, by facilitating and cheapening the reproduction of beautiful and elaborate designs, has no doubt helped much to popularize the book-plate—a thing which in older days was almost invariably restricted to ancestral libraries or to collections other wise important. Thus the great majority of modern plates are reproduced by process. There are, however, a few artists left who devote to book-plates their skill with the graver. Some of the work they produce challenges comparison with the finest produc tions of bygone engravers. Of these the best-known are C. W. Sherborn and G. W. Eve in England, and in America, J. W. Spenceley of Boston, Mass., K. W. F. Hopson of New Haven, Conn., and E. D. French of New York city.