CONSANGUINITY or KINDRED, in law, the connec tion or relation of persons descended from the same stock or com mon ancestor (vinculum personarum ab eodem stipite descenden tium). This consanguinity is either lineal or collateral. Lineal consanguinity is that which subsists between persons of whom one is descended in a direct line from the other, while collateral rela tions descend from the same stock or ancestor, but do not descend the one from the other. Collateral kinsmen, then, are such as lineal ly spring from one and the same ancestor, who is the stirps, or root, as well as the stipes, trunk or common stock, whence these rela tions branch out. It will be seen that the modern idea of con sanguinity is larger than that of agnatio in the civil law, which was limited to connection through males, and was modified by the ceremonies of adoption and emancipation, and also than that of cognatio, which did not go beyond the sixth generation, and was made the basis of Justinian's law of succession. The degrees of collateral consanguinity were differently reckoned in the civil and in the canon law. "The civil law reckons the number of descents between the persons on both sides from the common ancestor. The canon law counts the number of descents between the common ancestor and the two persons on one side only," and always on the side of the person who is more distant from the common ancestor. English law follows the canon law in beginning at the common ancestor and reckoning downwards. The question of consan guinity owes its great importance to the relationship it bears to the laws of marriage and inheritance. The laws of inheritance and descent are regulated in a great measure according to consan guinity, however much they may vary in different jurisdictions.
Apart from those countries which have made either the civil or the canon law the basis of reckoning degrees of consanguinity (and practically all civilized countries adopt one or other), it is impossible to describe any method or system, for they are as vari ous as the countries and tribes. See, however, the article INDIAN LAW ; and consult J. F. McLennan, On Primitive Marriage (1865); L. H. Morgan, Systems of Consanguinity and Affinity of the I- I 11 m an Family (187o); E. A. Westermarck, History of Human Mar riage (2nd ed., 1894) ; E. Crawley, The Mystic Rose 0902) ; A. Lang and J. J. Atkinson, Social Origins and Primal Law (19o3) ; E. B. Tylor, Primitive Culture (4th ed., 1903). See also AFFIN ITY ; MARRIAGE ; INHERITANCE; MATRIARCHY.