ESPIONAGE. The word "espionage" and its equivalents in most European languages are derived from a Germanic root which appears in the word spatien. The essential feature of espionage is its clandestine character. Espionage as practised between States may, therefore, be defined as "the attempt to obtain by clandestine means, for communication to a foreign government, information concerning another government which is likely to be injurious to that government." The clandestine character of espionage lays it open to objection from the moral point of view ; and espionage is, in fact, often practised by persons of undesirable character. As Montesquieu says, "Spying might perhaps be tolerable if it were done by men of honour; but the infamy which inevitably attaches to the agent is a criterion of the infamy of the practice." Individuals have taken the view that by practising espionage they were performing a necessary service to their own country. More generally, how ever, spies are recruited from among persons of doubtful char acter who are ready to undertake anything in order to earn money rapidly. The dangerous nature of the work has, moreover, a certain attraction for the adventurous.
In prisons and convict settlements the authorities employ spies known as "stool-pigeons" to discover plots for escape, to obtain confessions from prisoners, and in general to assist in ensuring pun ishment for all offences. The ex-convict Vidocq, when he became head of the Paris Surete in 1832, specialized in the employment of prison spies.
In political espionage, the spy very frequently acts as agent provocateur, particularly during periods of crisis such as civil wars, revolutions and religious persecutions. Skilful use of espion age was made in England by Burleigh and Walsingham in Eliza beth's reign, and in France under Louis XIII. and Louis XV., by the Lieutenants of Police d'Argenson, Berryer and Sartines. Lou vois set spies to watch over the conduct of his officers—a practice which has often recurred.
Fouche, who was minister of police from 1799 to 1802 and from 1804 to 181o, may be regarded as the real creator of political espionage, which he used to f oil the numerous plots concocted by Jacobins, royalists, émigrés and C/iouans during the Consulate and the Empire. In Russia, the famous Okhrana, or defensive police, was founded in 1881 to combat terrorism. It has been proved that Azeff, who was a member of the Central Committee of the People's Party, Pope Gapone, who played an important part in the revolution of 1905, and Malinowski, one of the deputies in the Duma, were all agents of the Okhrana. The Okhrana was responsible for the assassination of the Grand Duke Sergius, and of the ministers Plehve and Stolypin. Its activities reached their height in the period 1906-17. The famous Cheka, or "extraordinary commission for the repression of the counter revolution and of speculation," continued the methods of the Okhrana and applied them to the opponents of the Bolsheviks. Since 1925 the Cheka has been replaced by the G.P.U.
Political espionage is sometimes practised in the international sphere. The Holy Alliance covered Europe with a network of spies. It had informers, agent-provocateurs and spies among the various groups of political emigres in Paris and London. Heinrich Heine, Mdrger, Princess Lieven and the Countess Kalergis are stated to have sent information to the Cabinets of Vienna and St. Petersburg (Leningrad). Similarly, international espionage has been used to combat the activities of anarchists.
Modern diplomacy originated in the Italian cities of the middle ages ; and the early Italian ambassadors, particularly the Vene tians, were exceedingly able spies. Modern ambassadors have a technical staff of military, naval, aeronautical, commercial and legal attaches, whose duty it is to collect accurate information on various branches of national activity in foreign countries. It is thus possible to say that "an ambassador is often nothing more than an honourable spy acting under the protection of the law of nations." So long as a diplomatic agent maintains a correct attitude, and does not use unfair means such as bribing officials, or stealing doc uments, his activities are quite distinct from those which come under the definition of espionage. It has, however, often happened that diplomatic agents, such as ambassadors, consuls and attaches have failed to observe a correct attitude. Two examples will suf fice. In 1811, Col. Czernicheff, Russian attache in Paris, with the complicity of an employee of the ministry of war, named Michel, obtained access to certain documents and figures. He was sus pected and watched, but made his escape. Michel was shot. The second instance is the incident of the German and Italian military attaches in the Dreyfus affair. (See DREYFUS and ANTI-SEM