SOCIALISM, PRESENT AND FUTURE 1 1. Meanings of socialism. 1, 2. Philosophic socialism. ˘ 3. So cialism in action. 1 4. Origin of the radical socialist party. 1 5. The two pillars of "scientific" socialism. 1 6. Aspects of the material istic philosophy of history. 1 7. Utopian nature of "scientific" so cialism. 1 8. Its unreal and negative character. f 9. Revisionism in the Marxian ranks. f 10. Socialism and anarchism. § 11. Syndi calism and I. W. W. f 12. Guild socialism. 1 13. Opportunism in socialist party tactics. I 14. Alluring claims of party socialism. I 15. Changes in the socialist party vote. § 16. Economic legislation and the political parties.
This opinion, or plan, has appeared under a variety of names, the main ones being communism, collectivism, social democracy, and socialism, of which the last name has just now the greatest vogue. Socialism is a word of manifold 588 meanings no one of which is generally accepted. Discussion is therefore often a Babel of tongues. Much of the confusion may be cleared up by observing that the word "socialism" designates (1) a social 1 philosophy (2) a mode of social action, (3) a particular political party. There is thus philo sophic, active, and partizan socialism. Each of these may
be taken either in an absolute or in a more or less relative sense. The first meaning is the most fundamental, the second less so, and the last the least fundamental, but just now the most frequently used.
This social philosophy has taken form as "Christian Social ism" among men of strong religious natures, in various re ligious denominations. Great secular dreamers—Plato in his "Republic," Sir Thomas Moore. in his "Utopia," Edward Bellamy, in "Looking Backward," William Morris, in "News from Nowhere," and others—have painted beautiful pictures of ideal economic states from which all of the great evils and problems of our society have been banished.
production and the conduct of all business, assigning men, by authority, to particular work and granting them such in comes as the established authority thought they deserved. This kind exists nowhere, and never has existed, though it has been nearly approached in many parts of Russia under the Bolshevik regime.