These special organisations are in some respects the most in teresting feature of the League as an administrative machine. They consist for the most part of permanent committees, com posed of specialists and experts drawn either from the depart ments of the national Governments or from private institutions. These experts live and work normally in their own countries, and have the special knowledge of national forces and conditions, and possess the national influence, which no purely international officials can retain. But they meet periodically as members of a regular organisation. By this system, which follows closely the principles of the inter-Allied central organisation built up in the later years of the World War, the League obtains an execu tive instrument more expert, more effective and more economi cal than could possibly be obtained by the unaided service of its own whole-time officers. It binds together the national adminis trations of the world and forms them into an instrument of in ternational work. More than this, it permeates with its own spirit those who in their own countries are carrying on national work which reacts on the interests of other countries.
In these eight years thousands of such persons, no small pro portion of those who throughout the world are forming and ex ecuting the policies which determine international relations, have learnt, in regular co-operation with those of corresponding posi tion in other countries, the international point of view. It is thus a system which, apart from its direct utility, effects a peace ful penetration of the League point of view into national systems. In this elaborate and elastic system the permanent secretariat is the uniting element—the "coupling." Its importance results from the immense range and variety of the organs which it serves, and from the fact that these organs consist of councils, commis sions or committees meeting periodically, not in permanent ses sion, and consisting of persons whose main work is elsewhere, in their respective countries.
It is the task of the League to prevent political disputes caus ing war. It is most successful where it has been able by patient work in improving international relations, to remove the causes of disputes before they arise. In this wider sense most of the work of the League has a political aspect. In its mandates and minorities work, for example, the League is continually trying to establish conditions which will diminish the risks of future conflict ; and in such a piece of international co-operation as the reconstruction of Hungary, the existence of political differences constituted one of the main obstacles to success, and their settle ment one of its main rewards. The definite political disputes threatening to disturb international relations and, in some cases, the peace of the world, which have been submitted to the League of Nations are treated in this work under the individual headings, but something must be said here to illustrate the methods by which the League discharges its primary responsibility of pre serving the peace.
The first of these disputes (192o-21) was between Sweden and Finland over the Aland Islands and resulted in a most notable success. The second (192o-22) about Vilna (q.v.) was no less definitely a failure. The third issue, Upper Silesia in 1921 resulted from the incompleteness of the provision of the Treaty of Ver sailles. The settlement, of which details are given in the article SILESIA, has been considerably criticized both in Germany and Great Britain. It must be remembered, however, that the League had'no authority to fix an ideal frontier line, but only to apply the treaty provisions. At least a decision was reached, a long-standing cause of dissension between the Allies was removed, work was resumed and rioting ceased. In a further case, an invasion of Albania (q.v.) in 1921 by Yugo-Slav troops was successfully arrested. The Memel (q.v.) case (1923) is another instance of a peace treaty question handed over to the League because the Allies, acting through their normal machineries, had been unable to settle it. The Council, after enquiry through an impartial Corn mission, secured the acceptance of a convention by both parties.