ESSENTIALS TO BE RENDERED Mass.—From the renderer's point of view a building is, in the first place, a material mass. While it is not, in actuality, a mass in the sense that a mountain is a mass, i.e., it is not a solid, never theless the effect of solidity is essential to it. And while, in con structing a building, this effect may be the last to be realized, in drawing a building it is logically the first. The renderer must realize the presence of mass before he can fully realize the presence of any appurtenant form. It may be likened to the clay which a sculptor must grasp before any particular shape can be given or any details modelled. The first necessary attribute of a convincing architectural rendering is, correspondingly, an adequate suggestion of mass. Without this primary effect of solidity, all details which may be delineated later must appear without body and the pre sentation as a whole must lack substance.
imbued with a sense of the substantial nature that his subject, in general, possesses, the renderer addresses him self to a study of its particular form. It is generally taken for granted that if accurate floor plans and elevations are available, an accurate image of the building can be produced by following the rules of perspective draughtsmanship—those rules are said to have originated with Leonardo and are commonly accepted as being correct and comprehensive. The fact is, however, that there is considerable question as to how forms really look. It is quite doubtful if the system of perspective draughtsmanship which we accept as a science, is more than a convention—a convention which, indeed, is usually of great help to accurate representation and yet, in numerous instances, is a specific hindrance. The form ing, in the human eye of images of buildings appears, in fact, to involve factors with which we, as renderers, have not yet ade quately dealt (see PERSPECTIVE).
point, termed the "viewpoint" and his operations proceed from this base. But this assumption is inadequate to the extent that the appearance which a building actually produces on a one-eyed man is inadequate as compared to that produced on a two-eyed man. In some cases, the discrepancy is not remarkable—as, for example, small forms viewed at considerable distances. But, in forms which are closely scrutinized, the discrepancy becomes pro nounced ; there is a definite lack of the three-dimensional quality to the single-eyed vision, and there is a corresponding flatness to the general run of perspectives laid out from the single viewpoint.