Married woman must sue alone for injury to her separate property; Ackley v. Tarbox, 29 Barb. (N. Y.) 512 ; see Mississinewa Min. Co. v. Patton, 129 Ind. 472, 28 N. E. 1113, 28 Am. St. Rep. 203; she may bring an action of detinue to recover her separate personal property and join her husband as co-plain tiff ; Robinson v. Woodford, 37 W. Va. 377, 16 S. E. 602.
The restrictions on her power to sue are the same as in actions ex contractu; Broom, Part. 233. Actions in which she might or must have joined her husband survive to her ; Rolle, Abr. 349 (A). A married woman though living with her husband may main tain an action for slander in her own name, and without joining him; Pavlovski v. Thorn ton, 89 Ga. 829, 15 S. E. 822.
The dissolution of marriage by divorce does not enable the wife to sue her husband for a tort committed on her during cover ture ; Main v. Main, 46 III. App. 106. She may maintain in her own name an action for the ,alienation of her husband's affections; Haynes v. Nowlin, 129 Ind. 581, 29 N. E. 389, 14 L. R. A. 787, 28 Am. St. Rep. 213; Holmes v. Holmes, 133 Ind. 386, 32 N. E. 932.
Master has an action in tort for enticing away an apprentice; 3 Bla. Corn. 342 ; 3 Maule & S. 191; and, upon the same prin ciple, a parent for a child ; Van Horn v.
Freeman, 6 N. J. L. 322 ; 4 B. & C. 660 ; and for personal injury to his servant, for loss of time, expenses, etc.; 3 Bla. Com. 342.
For seduction or debauchery, a master ; Broom, Pvt. 227; Moran v. Dawes, 4 Cow. (N. Y.) 412 ; and if any service be shown, a parent ; 2 M. & W. 542; has his action.
Survivor, whether sole or several, must sue for a tortious injury, the rule being that the remedy, and not the right, survives ; Broom, Part. 212 ; 2 Maule & S. 225.
Tenants in. common must sue strangers separately in distress and avowry for rent; Decker v. Livingston, 15 Johns. (N. Y.) 479.
A tenant in common may sue his cotenant, where there has been actual ouster, in eject ment; Littleton § 322 ; 1 Campb. 173 ; or trespass quare clausum; McGill v. Ash, 7 Pa. 397; and trespass for mesne profits after recovery ; 3 Wils. Ch. 118. Where there is a total destruction or conversion of the prop erty, one tenant in common may sue his co tenant in trespass; Co. Litt. 200 a, b; Cro. Eliz. 157 ; 8 B. & C. 257 ; or in trover ; 1 Term 658; Leonard v. Scarborough, 2 Ga. 733; St. John v. Standring, 2 Johns. (N. Y.) 468 ; Guyther v. Pettijohn, 28 N. C. 388, 45 Am. Dec. 499. For a misfeasance, waste, or case in the nature of waste, may be brought.