This is the well known "Law of Effect" expressed in conative terms, and is identical with the principle already dealt with as the "Law of Association." Here, too, the law has sometimes been supposed to operate in conjunction with other laws—Recency and Frequency, and the same modification is here required. Re cency and Frequency are dependent and possibly counter acting laws but further determinations of the primary law. The more frequently and the more recently a given response has proved successful the more likely it is to recur.
between the two situations; the interest in B must be derivative from the interest in A or both must have a common origin. Many examples are to be found in the changes in theoretical interest. Practical construction may generate an interest in Physics, and this in turn may lead to Mathematics, the original practical in terest being weakened or wholly lost. A more primitive case of great importance is transference in the tendency to respond to a specific situation in a given way. The primitive response to opposition is destructive and aggressive. Under certain conditions this may be displaced by subtler and more delicate reactions. In general, the relative efficiency of different modes of response is the chief determinant of this form of modification.
The secondary features will according to circumstances either immediately evoke the original response or elicit a new one calcu lated to hasten the situation in which this response will be ap propriate. At the sound of danger, flight may ensue without awaiting the arrival of the enemy. But the distant perception of prey tends not to an immediate attempt to seize it, but to antecedent pursuit, until a situation arises in which the use of the jaws will be effective.
Situations to which the right response is known and productive of satisfaction themselves become the object of appetition. In this way chains of activity, considerable in length, will in course of time develop. This would seem to be the origin of the familiar "behaviour cycles." In following out such cycles awareness of the ultimate end is by no means likely to be present. Each step need only involve prevision of the initial phase of the next.
But as we have noted, from another point of view, such devel opments do not consist merely in the elaboration of actions in single file. Attention is directed not only to the central feature of the situation and its antecedents but extends to all attendant conditions. More particularly, when a given response is not con sistently successful a certain hesitancy will arise conducive to further discrimination and further variation. The successful re sponse will vary according to the context. Hence, relatively to any given presentation there will be alternative responses. The whole will constitute an extremely complex conative disposition.