DUKES OF KIEV From the reign of Sviatoslav's youngest son Vladimir the Nor man dynasty was definitely settled in Kiev. It still preserved its connections with other parts of Europe, attempted distant mili tary expeditions against its Slav neighbours and ruled the large territory from the northern lakes to the nomads of the steppe and from the then uncertain Polish frontier to the river Volga and the Caucasus. This was the most brilliant period of southern Russian history; but its brilliancy rested on an extremely unsafe base, as the connection between the newly built State and the country inhabitants remained very loose. The only link which unified the subdued tribes was the power of the grand duke of Kiev. The population paid their tribute to the prince's tax-col lectors ; but otherwise they were left to themselves and preserved their ancient tribal organisation and habits.
Kiev, Pereyaslavl (on the steppe frontier), Novgorod (the first Norman residence), then Smolensk (on the upper Dnieper) and Chernigov (on its confluent—Desna). All brothers of the first generation were considered as senior to the following generation. As soon as Kiev passed to another brother all the members of the family changed their seats and approached one step nearer to Kiev. If one died before reaching Kiev, his descendants were called isgoi and excluded from "mounting the scale." In the next column is a numbered table of successive reigns in Kiev during seven generations after Yaroslay.
The order of succession from brother to brother was kept only in the two first generations (I to 5). Numbers 9 and 1 2 show pref erence given to nephews over uncles. And indeed, as early as 1o97, at a conference held by the dukes at Liubech it was decided that the sons should keep their fathers' heritages. The direct suc cession from father to son prevailed in all dukedoms. Kiev was seen to be losing its former significance. Its great impor tance was based on trade; but southern trade was destroyed by the appearance in the steppe (1054) of the Polovtsi, nomads far more dangerous than the Petchenegs. It will also be seen that of all Yaroslav's sons only one line survived: that of Vsevolod and his brilliant son Vladimir Monomachos. Monomachos' line was then divided into two: the elder one (6, 9, 12) remained in Kiev and in its turn it was subdivided in two—Roman and Daniel preferred to move west from the then unsafe Kiev to Galicia, while two Mstislays, the Brave and the Daring, as their nicknames show, remained to the end the knights errant of the chivalrous South. The cadet branch of Vladimir Monomachos (io, 13, 14) opened a new period of Russian history. The centre of influence changed then to northern woodland, far from the steppe. It was a far poorer but safer and, in the long run, more profitable settlement. In 1169 Andrew's troops stormed Kiev. This was the end of southern brilliance though Kiev was not definitely destroyed till I240, by a last and most terrible invader, the Mongol Batu, Gen ghis-khan's nephew.