The Rotation Method.—For the rotation method originally due to de Broglie, an apparatus like fig. 8 is used The X-rays from a tube (not shown) pass through the fine barrel aperture and fall on the crystal, which is rotated uniformly on the spindle, driven by the motor. As each crystal plane comes into a reflecting position, the reflected ray registers on the photographic plate, producing a pattern such as shown in fig. 9. Each plane re flects four times per revolution, giving the photograph a sym metrical appearance. From the position of the spot on the plate, the spacings or the indices of the planes can be calculated. An important property of the rotation method is that if the crystal is rotated about a translation a of the lattice, all the reflected rays lie on a set of cones of angles where sincp= these cones intersect the plate in hyperbolae called layer lines (see fig. 9) and their distance apart is the best measure of the true axes of the crystal. It can be seen from the photograph that the spots are of very different intensities. These are usually estimated by eye, as strong, medium, weak, etc., so that the method is definitely in ferior in this respect to the ionisa tion spectrometer.
The Powder Method.—In the powder method, due to Debye and to Hull and Scherrer, a crys talline powder is used instead of a single crystal, depending on the fact that among so many grains some will be in the exact position to reflect. Consequently from the central beam diverge a set of cones each corresponding to the reflection from a single plane and forming circular rings on a plate (see fig. roA) or so-called Debye curves on a film bent round a cylinder (see fig. roB). Unfor tunately, many planes often have the same or nearly the same spacings, which causes them to be confused and limits the method to simple crystals. However, as it is the only method for sub stances which cannot be obtained as single crystals, it is very use ful, particularly for metals.
The Laue Method.—This de pends on a different principle from the first three. Here the crystal is kept fixed, and a beam of white X-rays, that is with wave lengths ranging from between .25 to .5 A. (Angstrom units = cm.), is passed through it, usually parallel to a crystallographic axis. The apparatus used is the same as before (see fig. 8). For a great number of planes there will always be some wave length which is right for reflection and a spot is formed, the position of which depends only on the angular position of the reflecting plane.
Thus the Laue method gives no information as to spacing. But, as can be seen from the photographs (see figs. i ra and r lb) it gives an excellent picture of the symmetry of the crystal and also of the relative intensities of a great number of reflecting planes.
Plainly, though any one of these methods but the last could be and has been used alone for crystal analysis, it is much better to use all to amplify and check each other's results. In this way we arrive at the experimental data for crystal analysis; the spacings and intensities of the X-ray re flections of a number of planes of known indices.
Stages in Structure Analy sis.—With these data the actual analysis divides into two parts. It is carried out schematically as follows: I. Determination of Cell Size.
The lengths of the three axes, a, b, c, are found from rotation photographs or from the spacing of planes given by the formula for orthogonal crystals. For monoclinic and triclinic crystals it is more complicated and here the angles between the axes are usually obtained from the external crystal form. It is easiest to use the pinacoid spacings (ioo) (cio) (ooi), which give the axes directly, but these may be halved, so for the true cell, one general plane (hid) at least must be taken.